BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//pretalx//pretalx.surf.nl//pidfest-26-2026//speaker//CB8LJM
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:CET
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20001029T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
TZNAME:CET
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20000326T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:CEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-pidfest-26-2026-D3ZSAA@pretalx.surf.nl
DTSTART;TZID=CET:20261029T120000
DTEND;TZID=CET:20261029T123000
DESCRIPTION:Research articles still lack a common way to keep a stable iden
 tifier while also supporting precise citation of specific versions. Too of
 ten\, platforms either overwrite an article so the reference remains stabl
 e or mint a new PID for every update\, even when that adds cost\, citation
  ambiguity\, and metadata overhead. In this session you will see how the r
 evised NISO Journal Article Versions (JAV) recommendations introduce seman
 tic versioning as a clearer alternative to article overwrites or to mintin
 g yet another PID. You will learn how semantic versioning can identify the
  exact version used\, when it can work better than assigning another PID\,
  and where a new PID still makes sense. You will also see how this approac
 h affects citations\, publisher policies\, preprint workflows\, and the di
 splay of an article's version history.
DTSTAMP:20260728T180014Z
LOCATION:LUMC03
SUMMARY:When Not to Mint Another PID for Article Versions - Patrick Hargitt
URL:https://pretalx.surf.nl/pidfest-26-2026/talk/D3ZSAA/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR